My preferred server platform is linux. I have not yet been able to move to a linux-based system for my daily work, and trust me I’ve tried a number of times to move to a Fedora or Ubuntu desktop. Windows is still best for productivity and day-to-day tasks, as well as compatibility with other office workers. However that brings up the question of how to access resources on a linux system, securely, and easily enough to not take too much time out of your workflow.

I have previously used the free WinSCP to do this. However, much like the FTP clients of yore, you need to transfer the file to your local PC, do the actual editing on your workstation (I prefer PSPad by the way), and then transfer the file back to the server.

Windows fixed this particular issue by adding in Mapped drives, which can connect to an FTP source. This is all great, and it works fine, but it is not a secure way to transfer files which may or may not include sensitive information in them.

Recently a few programs have come out that connect to an SSH server via SFTP and map a drive on your system. The two that I have found and are viable are called Webdrive and SftpDrive. Both products offer a secure connection to your SSH server, including a mapped drive letter. Below is a short review of each product:



SftpDrive is a program that does one thing and it does one thing well – it connects you to your server via SFTP. In my testing the speed was very fast, it seemed faster than my WinSCP connection even. It does not do caching, which in my mind is a good thing because it can cause problems with different versions of files moving between your system and the server source.

Their support is top notch – contacting them resulted in an immediate email back. They also have some great forums for user interaction, and the owner frequents there as well.

Price: $39 – unlimited upgrades to future versions


The other alternative is Webdrive. This software has a few more bells and whistles – notably:

  • Ability to map WebDAV and FTP in addition to SFTP servers
  • Caches remote directories locally

If you have the need to map a WebDAV or FTP connection, you can manage this right inside of this program. In this regards, this software will be a ‘one stop shop’ for mapping drives on your system.

It also can cache files on your local system. This has both advantages and disadvantages. The advantage, especially on a slower connection / link, is that when you edit a file on the drive you will actually be editing a file on your local PC, speeding up this process. The disadvantage with this, is that your server files may not be updated right away, adding a delay to when you edit a file and actually having it live on the server. This could add confusion when dealing with a configuration issue or other problem and adds a layer of complexity.

Price: $59.95 /w 1 year of upgrades, $79.95 /w 2 years of upgrades

Final Verdict
It was a close race but Sftpdrive comes out on top for my needs. Unless your organization has a need to keep mapped drives all under the same software, or you are working with a very slow connection, Sftpdrive will work fine for your needs. Also edging it closer to the win is the cheaper price, and the ability to receive upgrades to the software in the future without paying an additional fee. Using this software will increase the overall security of your day-to-day system administration tasks while reducing your time involved.

I would strongly recommend downloading a trial version of each software package and see which one fits your needs!

  • WebDrive – A 20-day demo version
  • SftpDrive – Get a trial 45-day key and download software

Note 1:
If you need an automated backup solution, I strongly recommend SyncBackSE. Using this backup software + Sftpdrive, you can have an automated, safe backup to an offsite location. Not only will your transfers be secure, but SyncBackSE will encrypt the contents of your backup on the remote location. This is great if you are using a server or other remote service to store your backups – although most services are reputable I wouldn’t want anyone to have access to my financial or other personal information.

Notes 2:
The faster your UPLOAD speed to the internet, the better performance you will see on your mapped SFTP drive. Currently the ISP which has the best upload speeds for the value in my area (Philadelphia) is Verizon Fios. Their lowest package offers 5mbit download, and 2mbit upload. This compares to Comcast which only offers a 384kbps upload on their basic package.

  1. Clients using Sftpdrive all have explorer crashing.

    SftpDrive have a thread about the problem with lots of people confirming the issue on their forums but no fixes.

  2. Clients using Sftpdrive all have explorer crashing.

    SftpDrive have a thread about the problem with lots of people confirming the issue on their forums but no fixes.

  3. I’m using Dokan SSHFS to map filesystem at my university as a drive letter,
    and it works nicely.

    First install Dokan library (dokan sshfs crashed without it..)

    Then install Dokan SSHFS, choose drive letter and login info, and that’s it…

    it’s all available at

Comments are closed.

You May Also Like

Awesome article on using the VI Text Editor

Awesome article on using vi/vim: Do whatever you want. Don’t learn it…

Social Media and the Downfall of the Password Reset Question

There have been a number of high profile account compromises due to…

Automatically Rip DVD using Handbrake and Autoplay (XP)

I am currently copying my DVD collection to my PC for use…

What a Resilver Looks Like in ZFS (and a Bug and/or Feature)

At home I have an (admittedly small) ZFS array set up to experiment with this neat newish raid technology. I think it has been around long enough that it can be used in production, but I’m still getting used to the little bugs/features, and here is one that I just found. After figuring out that I had 2 out of 3 of my 1TB Seagate Barracuda hard drives fail, I had to give the array up for a loss and test out my backup strategy. Fortunately it worked and there was no data loss. After receiving the replacement drives in from RMA, I rebuilt the ZFS array (using raidz again) and went along my merry way. After 6 months or so, I started getting some funky results from my other drive. Thinking it might have some issue as with the others, I removed the drive and ran Seatools on it (by the way, Seatools doesn’t offer a 64-bit Windows version – what year is this?). The drive didn’t show any signs of failure, so I decided to wipe it and add it back into the array to see what happens. That, of course, is easier said than done.